Secondary prevention by structured semi-interactive stroke prevention package in INDIA (SPRINT INDIA): Findings from the process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial

Author:

Verma Shweta Jain1ORCID,Gulati Puja2,Injety Ranjit J1,Arora Deepti1,Dhasan Aneesh3,Singhania Anusha1,Khatter Himani1,Sharma Meenakshi4,Sylaja Padmavathyamma Narayanapillai3ORCID,Pandian Jeyaraj Durai1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India

2. School of Pharmacy, Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, India

3. Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

4. Non-Communicable Diseases Section, Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

Abstract

Introduction: Secondary Prevention by Structured Semi-Interactive Stroke Prevention Package in INDIA Trial delivered secondary stroke awareness intervention to sub-acute stroke patients in form of workbook, videos and SMS across 31 centres in 12 languages. Trial was stopped for futility due to fewer vascular outcomes than anticipated. Trial results indicated that trial intervention, did not lead to reduction in vascular events. We carried out process evaluation, to evaluate trial implementation and participant’s perspectives, to comprehend the trial’s futile outcomes. Materials and Methods: Using mixed methods approach, qualitative interviews and quantitative data from case report forms, workbooks and questionnaires were analysed to measure intervention fidelity and contamination. Using purposive sampling, 115 interviews of patient-caregiver dyads and health professionals at 11 centres and 2 focus group discussions were held. Results and discussion: Iterative thematic analysis of qualitative data was done with RE-AIM and realist models. There was good fidelity to intervention and adherence to protocol; however, there was dilution of inclusion criteria by randomly enrolling uneducated and caregiver-dependent patients. Centre coordinators provided counselling to both arms, not specified by protocol, causing bias. Coordinators found it difficult to keep patients motivated to view intervention which was corroborated by fidelity questionnaire showing decreased viewing of intervention for a year. Cardiovascular protection improved in routine care by virtue of participating in trial. No contamination of intervention was reported. Conclusion: The intervention was acceptable by patients and caregivers, which could be made a community-based programme. Reasons identified for decreased viewing were repetitive content and non-availability of personal cellular device.

Funder

Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3