Sex differences in treatment, radiological features and outcome after intracerebral haemorrhage: Pooled analysis of Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials 1 and 2

Author:

Sandset Else Charlotte1ORCID,Wang Xia23,Carcel Cheryl234,Sato Shoichiro25,Delcourt Candice234,Arima Hisatomi26,Stapf Christian7,Robinson Thompson8,Lavados Pablo9,Chalmers John234,Woodward Mark21011,Anderson Craig S2412ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

2. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

3. Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

4. Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia

5. Department of Cerebrovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

6. Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

7. Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada

8. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

9. Unidad de Neurología vascular, Servicio de Neurología, Departamento de Medicina, Clínica Alemana; Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile

10. The George Institute for Global Health, Imperial College London, UK

11. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA

12. The George Institute China at Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China

Abstract

Introduction Reports vary on how sex influences the management and outcome from acute intracerebral haemorrhage. We aimed to quantify sex disparities in clinical characteristics, management, including response to blood pressure lowering treatment, and outcomes in patients with acute intracerebral haemorrhage, through interrogation of two large clinical trial databases. Patients and Methods Post-hoc pooled analysis of the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials 1 and 2, where patients with a hypertensive response (systolic, 150–220 mmHg) after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (<6 h) were randomised to intensive (target <140 mmHg <1 h) or guideline-recommended (<180 mmHg) blood pressure lowering treatment. The interaction of sex on early haematoma growth (24 h), death or major disability (modified Rankin scale scores 3–6 at 90 days), and effect of randomised treatment were determined in multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for baseline confounding variables. Results In 3233 participants, 1191 (37%) were women who were significantly older, had higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores and smaller haematoma volumes compared to men. Men had higher three-month mortality (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.10–2.00); however, there was no difference between women and men in the combined endpoint of death or major disability. There were no significant sex differences on mean haematoma growth or effect of randomised blood pressure lowering treatment. Discussion Men included in the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials had more comorbidities, larger baseline haematoma volumes and higher mortality after adjustment for age, as compared with women. Conclusion Men included in the Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials had a greater odds of dying after intracerebral haemorrhage than women, which could not be readily explained by differing casemix or patterns of blood pressure management. Clinical trial registration The Intensive Blood Pressure Reduction in Acute Cerebral Haemorrhage trials studies are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00226096 and NCT00716079).

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3