Affiliation:
1. Work Research Institute/Vestfold University College, Norway,
Abstract
It is a common assumption that action research exists in a number of varieties. In efforts to explain these varieties, the point of departure is sometimes sought in differences in practical challenges, sometimes in differences in theoretical outlook. Taken separately, these perspectives can, however, both be too limited. Drawing upon an action research tradition that has been in existence for four decades, it will be seen that one and the same tradition has passed through a series of different ways of combining theory and practice. The prime moving force has been success and failure in meeting specific practical challenges; the role of theory has been to deepen the understanding of these challenges and indicate what courses of action are open in each specific situation.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Sociology and Political Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Bakke, N.A. (2001). The report to the benchmarking group. In B. Gustavsen, H. Finne & B. Oscarsson (Eds.), Creating connectedness: The role of social research in innovation policy (pp. 41-58). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Action research: Explaining the diversity
Cited by
47 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献