Jargon Be Gone – Patient Preference in Doctor Communication

Author:

Allen Katherine A1ORCID,Charpentier Victoria2,Hendrickson Marissa A3,Kessler Molly4,Gotlieb Rachael2,Marmet Jordan1,Hause Emily5,Praska Corinne2,Lunos Scott6,Pitt Michael B1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Medicine Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

2. School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

3. Department of Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

4. Department of Writing Studies, College of Liberal Arts University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

5. Department of Pediatrics, Rheumatology Division, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

6. Biostatistical Design and Analysis Center, Clinical and Translational Science, Institute University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Abstract

While it has been shown that healthcare providers often use medical jargon, less is known about how patients prefer their clinicians communicate. This mixed-methods study aimed to better understand the general public's preference in healthcare communication. A volunteer cohort of 205 adult attendees at the 2021 Minnesota State Fair was presented a survey with two scenarios at a doctor's office sharing the same information: one using medical terminology and one using simpler, jargon-free language. Survey participants were asked which doctor they preferred, to describe each doctor, and to explain why they believe that doctors may use medical terminology. Common descriptive themes for the jargon-using doctor included that this doctor caused confusion, was too technical, and was uncaring, while the doctor who spoke without jargon was perceived as a good communicator, caring/empathetic, and approachable. Respondents perceived a range of reasons why doctors use jargon, from not recognizing they are using words that are not understood to trying to make themselves feel more important. Overall, 91% of survey respondents preferred the doctor who communicated without medical jargon.

Funder

National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences

University of Minnesota Driven to Discover Grant

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3