Patients’ and Family Members’ Subjective Experiences of a Diagnostic Evaluation of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Author:

Morris Jonna L1,Hu Lu2,Hunsaker Amanda3,Liptak Amy4,Seaman Jennifer Burgher5,Lingler Jennifer H6

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

2. Department of Population Health, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

3. Institute of Communication and Media Research, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland

4. Department of Nurse Anesthesia, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

5. Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

6. Department of Health and Community Systems, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: People with a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often struggle with uncertainty and fear when learning of and coping with their diagnosis. However, little is known about their experiences and perspectives, and those of their care partners, when seeking out and undergoing a diagnostic evaluation for their cognitive symptoms. Method: This study is a secondary analysis of a focus group discussion that was initially conducted to learn the perspectives and experiences of participants and their care partners during a mock disclosure session of brain scan results. Participant’s broader views on their experience of completing a cognitive evaluation resulting in an MCI diagnosis were evaluated in this study. Analysis used qualitative content methodology and line-by-line coding which generated categories and themes. Results: The (1) “presence of a threat” and (2) attempts to “minimize the threat” emerged as overarching themes driving the process of seeking out a diagnostic evaluation for cognitive symptoms. Subthemes that highlight the complexity of the presence of a threat included the “fear of stigma,” and the “emotional reactions” related to an MCI diagnosis. Three additional subthemes represented approaches that participants and their care partners used to minimize threat of MCI: “use of language” to minimize the threat; “information sharing and withholding”; and the “use of social support to legitimize personal experiences.” Conclusion: These findings add to the literature by elucidating the uncertainty, fears, and coping strategies that accompany a diagnostic evaluation of MCI.

Funder

National Institute of Health/ National Institute for Aging

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3