Experimental Teaching

Author:

Casey Ann1,Deno Stanley2,Marston Douglas3,Skiba Russ1

Affiliation:

1. Minneapolis Public Schools

2. Special Education at the University of Minneapolis

3. Institute for Child Study at Indiana University in Bloomington

Abstract

The impact of an experimental teaching format on teacher beliefs about effective instructional practice was investigated. Teachers were required to use frequent curriculum-based measurement to test their a priori hypotheses about the relative effectiveness of three different strategies with a subgroup of students. All strategies were designed and selected by the teachers. In afl, effects of 12 strategies were compared to baseline. The effects of strategy testing on teacher beliefs and knowledge were examined by contrasting experimental teachers with volunteers and nonvolunteers. The results indicate that the experimental teachers became less dogmatic in their beliefs about effective teaching strategies and were more inclined to accept the premise that teaching strategies are scientific hypotheses to be tested.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Education

Cited by 13 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Implementation Drivers of Data-Based Instruction for Students With Intensive Learning Needs: A Systematic Review;Journal of Learning Disabilities;2023-12-30

2. Effects of Data-Based Individualization for Students with Intensive Learning Needs: A Meta-Analysis;Learning Disabilities Research & Practice;2018-06-28

3. Data-Based Decision-Making;Handbook of Response to Intervention;2015-09-22

4. Republication of “Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Standardized, Long-Term Goal Approach to Monitoring Student Progress”;Intervention in School and Clinic;2014-12-11

5. Instigating Fundamental Change through Experiential Inservice Development;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2000-04

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3