Effectiveness and Safety of Percutaneous Treatment in Lesions Suggestive of Thyroid Cancer (Bethesda V and VI—T1aN0M0) Compared to Surgical Treatment: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Introduction: Thyroid nodules are common entities, with 5% malignancy. Differentiated thyroid cancer represents 90% of thyroid malignancies, with papillary carcinoma being the most common. Management is generally surgical; among its complications are injury to the recurrent laryngeal and superior laryngeal nerve, causing hoarseness, postsurgical hypoparathyroidism, hypothyroidism, and pain. Other noninvasive percutaneous interventions of thermal ablation such as microwave, radiofrequency, or laser incur lower costs and could be an option for treatment. Objective: To determine the effectiveness and safety of thermal ablation in lesions suspected of thyroid cancer (Bethesda V and VI/T1aN0M0) compared to surgical treatment. Methods: Systematic review/meta-analysis of observational studies and clinical trials. Database search includes MEDLINE/PUBMED, Embase, Scopus, Scielo, and BVS/LILACS. Studies on patients over 18 years of age with lesions suspicious of thyroid cancer were included. Results: A total of 10 studies were obtained, with 2939 patients: 1468 subjected to thermal ablation and 1471 to surgery. Regarding effectiveness, no differences were found in local recurrence [relative risk (RR) 1.17 (95% CI 0.69-1.99)] and cervical lymph node metastasis [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.43-1.36)]. Regarding safety, infection [RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.05-1.74)], hematoma [RR 0.57 (95% CI 0.17-1.94)], and transient hoarseness [RR 0.77 (95% CI 0.39-1.51)] were evaluated, without difference. However, permanent hoarseness had significant differences in favor of thermal ablation [RR 0.29 (95% CI 0.11-0.75)]. Conclusions: Thermal ablation for the treatment of T1aN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma is equally effective when compared to surgical techniques and offers a better safety profile, particularly in permanent hoarseness.