Failure Leads Protest Movements to Support More Radical Tactics

Author:

Louis Winnifred R.1ORCID,Lizzio-Wilson Morgana2ORCID,Cibich Mikaela23,McGarty Craig4,Thomas Emma F.2ORCID,Amiot Catherine E.5,Weber Nathan2,Rhee Joshua6ORCID,Davies Grace1,Rach Timothy1,Goh Syasya1,McMaster Zoe1,Muldoon Orla7ORCID,Howe Naoimh7,Moghaddam Fathali8

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

2. College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

3. Centre for Remote Health, Alice Springs, Australia

4. School of Psychology, Western Sydney University, Kingswood, Australia

5. Department of Psychology, Université du Québec à Montréal, Canada

6. Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Australia

7. Department of Psychology, University of Limerick, Ireland

8. Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA

Abstract

Most social movements will encounter setbacks in their pursuit of sociopolitical change. However, little is known about how movements are affected after protestors fail to achieve their aims. What are the effects of failure on subsequent engagement in various conventional and radical actions? Does failure promote divergent reactions among protestors and/or dissatisfaction with democracy? A meta-analysis of nine experiments ( N = 1,663) assessed the effects of one-off failure on protestors’ reactions, subsequent tactical choices, and support for democracy; and iterative stochastic simulations modeled the effects of failure over multiple protests over time. Results indicated that initial failure gives rise to divergent, somewhat contradictory responses among protestors and that these responses are further influenced by the repeated failure (vs. success) over time. Further, the simulations identified “tipping points” in these responses that promote radicalization and undermine support for democracy.

Funder

Australian Research Council Discovery Project

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Clinical Psychology,Social Psychology

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3