Breaking barriers in higher education: Implementation of cost-effective social constructivism in engineering education

Author:

Khalid Azfar1ORCID,Kazim Tayyaba2,Diaz Katherine Regina Vasquez3,Iqbal Jamshed4

Affiliation:

1. Digital Innovation Research Group, Department of Engineering, School of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

2. Department of Biosciences, School of Science & Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

3. Faculty of Arts, Culture and Education, University of Hull, Hull, UK

4. Department of Computer Science and Technology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Hull, Hull, UK

Abstract

Social constructivism is considered the main driver of curriculum overhaul for the new set of learning in the digital age. Implementation of cost-effective solutions of social constructivism in higher education is a challenge. The paper circumnavigates around the principle and practice methods and implemented in a module design for robotics teaching to students from diverse academic backgrounds and familiarity levels. A gap analysis between the current practices of a generalized module design and a social constructive approach revealed the specific areas for a focussed approach to consider. Such strategies are employed in the module redesigning strategy and found cost-effective and impactful in Engineering higher education. The designed module is presented to engineering students in an integrated robotics education in the context of control, communication, sensing and biomechatronics. Multiple implemented innovations for social constructivism in different aspects of the module have not only made it a popular option among engineering students but also resulted in better engagement, student achievement, inclusivity, and resource utilization.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering,Education

Reference47 articles.

1. Teaching and Learning in Engineering Education – Are We Moving with the Times?

2. Tingerthal J. Work in progress: Signature pedagogies in engineering - surface structure. In: (2017a) ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Columbus, Ohio [Internet], 2017, pp.6. https://peer.asee.org/29178

3. Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices

4. Critical Theoretical Frameworks in Engineering Education: An Anti-Deficit and Liberative Approach

5. Teaching the Force Concept: A Constructivist Teaching Experiment in Engineering Education

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Proses Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme yang Bersifat Generatif di Sekolah Dasar;Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar;2024-05-31

2. Exploring AI and Dialogic Education Outcomes From a Learning Sciences Perspective;Advances in IT Standards and Standardization Research;2024-02-23

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3