Sedation as an alternative anesthetic technique for frail patients in transurethral resection of the prostate

Author:

Ayoub Christian Habib1ORCID,Chalhoub Viviane2,El-Achkar Adnan1,Abou Heidar Nassib1,Tamim Hani34,Maroun-Aouad Marie5,El Hajj Albert6

Affiliation:

1. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

2. Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University Medical School, Beirut, Lebanon

3. Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon

4. College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

5. Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon

6. Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO BOX: 11-0236, Riad El Solh 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon

Abstract

Background: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) under Monitored Anesthesia Care MAC/Sedation (macTURP), as compared with TURP under general (genTURP) or spinal (spTURP) anesthesia, is a safer and infrequently used technique reserved for high-risk patients. Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes of TURP using the three types of anesthesia techniques. Design and methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent TURP between 2008 and 2019. Demographics, lab values, medical history, and 30-day outcomes were compared. Univariate and multivariate regression models for postoperative complications were constructed. A propensity score–matched analysis was then performed for genTURP and macTURP and for spTURP and macTURP as a sensitivity analysis. Results: A total of 53,182 patients underwent TURP. Older patients (>80) with diabetes requiring insulin (7.9%), leukocytosis (7.4%), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (7.8%), dyspnea (7.2%), and of ASA > 2 (58.8%) were more likely to undergo macTURP as compared with genTURP ( p < 0.013). SpTURP showed lower rates of urinary tract infection (UTI) [odds ratio (OR) = 0.869] as compared with genTURP ( p = 0.049), whereas macTURP showed higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (OR = 2.179) as compared with genTURP ( p = 0.005). All other postoperative complications showed similar rates between the three procedures. The propensity-matched cohorts demonstrated that no differences in postoperative complication rates were noted between macTURP and genTURP and between macTURP and spTURP. Conclusion: MacTURP was found to be feasible with a good safety profile as compared with genTURP and spTURP. MacTURP could be used in elderly, frail, and co-morbid patients with a similar safety profile as compared with more invasive anesthetic techniques.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3