RIRS with disposable or reusable scopes: does it make a difference? Results from the multicenter FLEXOR study

Author:

Gauhar Vineet1,Chai Chu Ann2,Chew Ben H3,Singh Abhishek4,Castellani Daniele5,Tailly Thomas6,Emiliani Esteban7,Keat William Ong Lay8,Ragoori Deepak9,Lakmichi Mohamed Amine10,Teoh Jeremy Yuen-Chun11,Traxer Olivier12,Somani Bhaskar Kumar13ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore

2. Urology Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

3. Department of Urology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

4. Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India

5. Urology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy

6. Department of Urology, University Hospital of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium

7. Urology Department, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

8. Department of Urology, Penang General Hospital, Penang, Malaysia

9. Asian Institute of Nephrourology, Hyderabad, India

10. Department of Urology, University Hospital Mohammed the VIth of Marrakesh, Marrakesh, Morocco

11. S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong

12. Department of Urology, AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France

13. Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK

Abstract

Introduction: With several single-use ureteroscopes now available, our aim was to analyze and compare data obtained globally from high-volume centers using both disposable and reusable flexible ureteroscopes and see if indeed in real-world practice either scope has a distinct advantage. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on the FLEXOR registry, which was created as a TOWER group (Team of Worldwide Endourological Researchers, research wing of the Endourological Society) endeavor. Patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 were enrolled from 20 centers globally. A total of 6663 patients whose data were available for analysis were divided into Group 1 (Reusable scopes, 4808 patients) versus Group 2 (Disposable scopes, 1855 patients). Results: The age and gender distribution were similar in both groups. The mean stone size was 11.8 mm and 9.6 mm in Groups 2 and 1, respectively ( p < 0.001). Group 2 had more patients with >2 cm stones, lower pole stones and of higher Hounsfield unit. Thulium fiber laser (TFL) was used more in Group 2 ( p < 0.001). Patients in Group 2 had a slightly higher stone-free rate (SFR) (78.22%) and a lower number of residual fragments (RFs) compared with Group 1 ( p < 0.001). The need for further treatments for RF and overall complications was comparable between groups. On multivariate analysis, overall complications were more likely to occur in elderly patients, larger stone size, lower pole stones, and were also more when using disposable scopes with longer operative time. RFs were significantly higher ( p < 0.001) for lower pole, larger, harder, multiple stones and in elderly. Conclusion: Our real-world practice observations suggest that urologists choose disposable scopes for bigger, lower pole, and harder stones, and it does indeed help in improving the single-stage SFR if used correctly, with the appropriate lasers and lasing techniques in expert hands.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3