Single-port robotic partial nephrectomy: impact on perioperative outcomes and hospital stay

Author:

Carbonara Umberto123ORCID,Amparore Daniele34,Borregales Leonardo D.35,Caliò Anna6,Ciccarese Chiara37,Diana Pietro38,Erdem Selcuk39ORCID,Marandino Laura310,Marchioni Michele311,Muselaers Constantijn H.J.312,Palumbo Carlotta13,Pavan Nicola314,Pecoraro Angela315,Roussel Eduard316,Warren Hannah317,Wu Zhen-Jie318,Campi Riccardo31920ORCID,Bertolo Riccardo321

Affiliation:

1. Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70125, Bari, Italy

2. Department of Urology, Royal Surrey Country Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom

3. Renal Cancer Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands

4. Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, San Luigi Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

5. Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA

6. Department of Pathology and Diagnostic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

7. Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy

8. Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

9. Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

10. Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

11. Department of Urology, SS Annunziata Hospital, ‘G. D’Annunzio’ University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy

12. Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

13. Renal Cancer Working Group, Young Academic Urologists (YAU), European Association of Urology (EAU), Arnhem, The Netherlands; Urology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy

14. Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

15. Department of Urology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy

16. Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

17. Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK

18. Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China

19. Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

20. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

21. Department of Urology, San Carlo Di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy

Abstract

Single-port (SP) robotic surgery is a novel technology and is at the beginning of its adoption curve in urology. The goal of this narrative review is to provide an overview of SP-robotic partial nephrectomy (PN) 4 years after the introduction of the da Vinci SP dedicated platform, focusing on perioperative outcomes, length of stay, and surgical technique. A nonsystematic review of the literature was conducted. The research included the most updated articles that referred to SP robotic PN. Since its commercial release in 2018, several institutions have reproduced robotic PN by using the SP platform, both via a transperitoneal and a retroperitoneal approach. The published SP-robotic PN series are generally based on preliminary experiences by surgeons who had previous experience with conventional multi-arms robotic platforms. The reported outcomes are encouraging. Overall, three studies reported that SP-robotic PN cases had nonsignificantly different operative time, estimated blood loss, overall complications rate, and length of stay compared to the conventional ‘multi-arms’ robotic PN. However, in all these series, renal masses treated by SP had overall lower complexity. Moreover, two studies underlined decreased postoperative pain as a major pro of adopting the SP system. This should reduce/avoid the need for opioids after surgery. No study compared SP-robotic versus multi-arms robotic PN in cost-effectiveness. Published experience with SP-robotic PN has reported the feasibility and safety of the approach. Preliminary results are encouraging and at least noninferior with respect to those from the multi-arms series. Prospective comparative studies with long-term oncologic and functional results are awaited to draw more definitive conclusions and better establish the more appropriate indications of SP robotics in the field of PN.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Urology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perspective Chapter: An Update on Renal Cell Carcinoma;Renal Cell Carcinoma - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Applications;2023-09-13

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3