Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
Abstract
The capital goods for collection and transport of waste were quantified for different types of containers (plastic containers, cubes and steel containers) and an 18-tonnes compacting collection truck. The data were collected from producers and vendors of the bins and the truck. The service lifetime and the capacity of the goods were also assessed. Environmental impact assessment of the production of the capital goods revealed that, per tonne of waste handled, the truck had the largest contribution followed by the steel container. Large high density polyethylene (HDPE) containers had the lowest impact per tonne of waste handled. The impact of producing the capital goods for waste collection and transport cannot be neglected as the capital goods dominate (>85%) the categories human-toxicity (non-cancer and cancer), ecotoxicity, resource depletion and aquatic eutrophication, but also play a role (>13%) within the other impact categories when compared with the impacts from combustion of fuels for the collection and transport of the waste, when a transport distance of 25 km was assumed.
Subject
Pollution,Environmental Engineering
Reference15 articles.
1. Hauschild M, Potting J (2005) Spatial differentiation in LCA impact assessment – The EDIP 2003 methodology. Environmental news No. 80 2005. Guideline from the Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Copenhagen, Denmark.
2. Jensen CH (2010) Personal communication with Regulation and Certification Manager Claus Henrik Jensen at Volvo Lastvogne Danmark A/S, Volvo Nordic, Denmark.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献