Waste audits in healthcare: A systematic review and description of best practices

Author:

Slutzman Jonathan E12ORCID,Bockius Hannah3,Gordon Ilyssa O4,Greene Hannah C5,Hsu Sarah6,Huang Yiming7,Lam Michelle H8,Roberts Timothy9,Thiel Cassandra L10

Affiliation:

1. Center for the Environment and Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA

4. Robert J. Tomsich Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Institute, Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

5. Department of Biology, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

6. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

7. NYU Shanghai, Pudong, Shanghai, China

8. Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, USA

9. Health Sciences Library, NYU Langone Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA

10. Grossman School of Medicine, Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, Tandon School of Engineering, New York University, New York, NY, USA

Abstract

Healthcare generates large amounts of waste, harming both environmental and human health. Waste audits are the standard method for measuring and characterizing waste. This is a systematic review of healthcare waste audits, describing their methods and informing more standardized auditing and reporting. Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Inspec, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection databases for published studies involving direct measurement of waste in medical facilities. We screened 2398 studies, identifying 156 studies for inclusion from 37 countries. Most were conducted to improve local waste sorting policies or practices, with fewer to inform policy development, increase waste diversion or reduce costs. Measurement was quantified mostly by weighing waste, with many also counting items or using interviews or surveys to compile data. Studies spanned single procedures, departments and hospitals, and multiple hospitals or health systems. Waste categories varied, with most including municipal solid waste or biohazardous waste, and others including sharps, recycling and other wastes. There were significant differences in methods and results between high- and low-income countries. The number of healthcare waste audits published has been increasing, with variable quality and general methodologic inconsistency. A greater emphasis on consistent performance and reporting standards would improve the quality, comparability and usefulness of healthcare waste audits.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pollution,Environmental Engineering

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3