Abstract
The efficacy of two improvement-over-chance or I effect sizes, derived from predictive discriminant analysis (PDA) and logistic regression analysis (LRA), was investigated for two-group univariate mean comparisons. Data were generated under selected levels of population separation, variance pattern, sample size, and distribution shape. Based on the accuracy of sample estimates, both I indices are acceptable under optimal conditions except when both population separation and sample size are small. Under variance heterogeneity and normality, I derived from LRA is acceptable if n sizes are equal. When n sizes are unequal, I derived from LRA is acceptable only if variance heterogeneity is moderate and population separation is not small. Under nonnormality, I derived from LRA is acceptable regardless of the variance pattern provided n sizes are equal. Finally, for greater precision, I derived from LRA should be used under large sample sizes.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献