Affiliation:
1. University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
Abstract
Problems of definition and conceptualization have plagued the word “brand” for longer than any reader’s professional memory. Conejo and Wooliscroft have recently addressed this issue in their creative and radical Journal of Macromarketing article challenging especially the American Marketing Association’s official definition of brand. The following note offers response to the central content of the authors’ framework and discusses derived semantic and conceptual concerns, while endeavoring to contribute to a coherent and viable understanding of the brand construct and its surrounding conceptual system, but from a different posture than their approach. Unless a generally accepted understanding of the elemental brand term and construct is settled upon, shoring up our field’s conceptual underpinning, one large part of the body of marketing theory will remain ethereal.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Corporate branding in perspective: a typology;European Journal of Marketing;2017-09-12
2. The Times (and Brands) are a Changin’;Journal of Macromarketing;2014-12-17