Affiliation:
1. Department of Sociology, University of Arizona
Abstract
Both sociologists and rational choice theorists have been concerned with the production of social order Rational choice theorists argue that sanctions are necessary and sufficient causes of social order, but since it is costly to provide them, the attainment of social order is problematic Sociologists are more optimistic about the prospects of attaining social order because, in addition to sanctions, they countenance internalized controls as potential causes. This paper demonstrates that social order is even more difficult to explain from rational choice premises than is usually appreciated. This is because the cost of providing sanctions is far from the only relevant mon itoring cost that is implied by rational choice reasoning. The argument is principally illustrated by examples drawn from the history of capitalist industrial management
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
33 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Solidarity: A European Value?;Values – Politics – Religion: The European Values Study;2023
2. Norms;International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences;2015
3. Travail de contrôle, usure du contrôle;RIMHE : Revue Interdisciplinaire Management, Homme & Entreprise;2014-01-01
4. Equity Aversion: Social Norms and the Desire to be Ahead;American Economic Journal: Microeconomics;2012-11-01
5. Me or We: The Effects of CEO Organizational Identification on Agency Costs;Academy of Management Journal;2011-06