Whose confidence? Regional leaders’ perspectives on building confidence in a reconfigured probation service

Author:

Robinson Gwen1ORCID,Annison Harry2,Burke Lol3,Carr Nicola4ORCID,Millings Matthew3,Surridge Eleanor3

Affiliation:

1. University of Sheffield, UK

2. University of Southampton, UK

3. Liverpool John Moores University, UK

4. University of Nottingham, UK

Abstract

The idea that the institutions of criminal justice should command the confidence of the public and other stakeholders is a taken for granted ‘good’, but one which has rarely been considered from the perspectives of operational leaders within those institutions. We also know little about what happens at times of crisis, when claims are made about the erosion of confidence and leaders are charged with rebuilding it. In this article, we seek to engage critically with the idea of confidence in one criminal justice institution – the Probation Service in England & Wales – at just such a time. Drawing on original empirical research with the 12 leaders of the recently unified service, this article focuses on the question of whose confidence matters and considers some of the challenges associated with confidence-building work from the perspectives of these leaders. Our research revealed that the stakeholder groups whose confidence most concerned them were sentencers and other partner agencies; government ministers; and their own staff within the unified service. We introduce the idea of ‘domains of confidence’ to highlight the importance of understanding perspectives on confidence (and efforts to strengthen or rebuild it) in a relational space in which the particular positionality of actors in the criminal justice field must be understood.

Funder

Economic and Social Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law

Reference53 articles.

1. Seeing and believing: Observing desistance-focused practice and enduring values in the National Probation Service

2. Changing public attitudes to crime and punishment — Building confidence in community penalties

3. Archer N, Butler M, Avukatu G, et al. (2022) Public knowledge of and confidence in the criminal justice system and sentencing: 2022 research. Available at: https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022-12-12-P019988-Sentencing-Council_Perceptions_Report_v14_FINAL.pdf (accessed 27 May 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3