Affiliation:
1. Leuven Institute of Criminology (LINC), KU Leuven, Belgium; Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, The Netherlands
2. University of Tennessee, USA; Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement, The Netherlands
Abstract
Secondary victimization is a key concept in research into the experiences of victims of crime, related policies and legislation, and practices of support and care. However, the current conceptualization of secondary victimization suffers from a number of shortcomings. These include conceptual confusion, such that negative but varied emotional and psychological experiences are lumped together. Moreover, the current conceptualization of secondary victimization is too narrow, in that it tends to neglect the absence of actions and more covert structural biases of the criminal justice system, and too broad, in that it makes no distinction between voluntary and involuntary modes of victim participation. We argue that these shortcomings can be overcome by articulating the injustice in secondary victimization by reference to Miranda Fricker’s notion of epistemic injustice. Secondary victimization wrongs victims in their capacity as knowers. To develop this idea, the article highlights the connections between the literature on epistemic injustice and victimology.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. “Because I Was the One to Blame, Right?”;Advances in Information Security, Privacy, and Ethics;2024-04-05
2. Legal Fictions in Various Forms of Victim Participation;International Criminology;2024-03