Sanitation potpourri: Criteria for planning mix of sanitation systems for citywide inclusive sanitation

Author:

Mitra Anant12,Narayan Abishek S12,Lüthi Christoph1

Affiliation:

1. Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland

2. ETH: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Sanitation is a universal need and thus requires universal access. Despite having the world’s largest sanitation campaign, only 37% of urban India has access to safely managed sanitation systems. Due to the heterogeneity of Indian cities, a mix of different sanitation systems is required to meet the demands of these rapidly urbanising cities. The Manila principles on Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) propose a mix of technologies as a key pillar in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals on urban sanitation. However, there is a lack of understanding on the criteria to consider when planning the technological options for CWIS. The mega-city of Chennai is chosen as a case study, and mixed methods including a Faecal Waste Flow diagram (SFD), Social Network Analysis (SNA) and interviews are applied. This study then presents a set of 14 contextually relevant criteria for the implementation of sewered and non-sewered technologies in the city. The SFD shows that 35% of Chennai’s faecal waste remains unsafely managed while using SNA identified that the water and sanitation utility, the municipal corporation and the slum clearance board are the best placed stakeholders in the city to create a change in the sanitation situation. Furthermore, 17 drivers and barriers for the implementation of non-sewered technologies are identified. The criteria catalogue was also theoretically tested for an example ward in Chennai. The findings of the study show that a catalogue of physical, technical, institutional and financial criteria is useful for planning a mix of technologies with the CWIS approach.

Funder

Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development,Architecture

Reference65 articles.

1. Balakrishnan K (2016) Heterogeneity within Indian cities. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sr333g9 (accessed 30 September 2021).

2. Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems

3. Barnes R, Ashbolt N (2006) Review of decision tools and trends for water and sanitation development projects (2006). Loughborough University. Available at: https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/Review_of_decision_tools_and_trends_for_water_and_sanitation_development_projects/9596627 (accessed 30 September 2021).

4. Bastian M, Heymann S, onconference, MJ-T international A, et al. (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. aaai.org. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/viewPaper/154 (accessed 1 October 2021).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3