Affiliation:
1. Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
2. ETH: Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract
Sanitation is a universal need and thus requires universal access. Despite having the world’s largest sanitation campaign, only 37% of urban India has access to safely managed sanitation systems. Due to the heterogeneity of Indian cities, a mix of different sanitation systems is required to meet the demands of these rapidly urbanising cities. The Manila principles on Citywide Inclusive Sanitation (CWIS) propose a mix of technologies as a key pillar in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals on urban sanitation. However, there is a lack of understanding on the criteria to consider when planning the technological options for CWIS. The mega-city of Chennai is chosen as a case study, and mixed methods including a Faecal Waste Flow diagram (SFD), Social Network Analysis (SNA) and interviews are applied. This study then presents a set of 14 contextually relevant criteria for the implementation of sewered and non-sewered technologies in the city. The SFD shows that 35% of Chennai’s faecal waste remains unsafely managed while using SNA identified that the water and sanitation utility, the municipal corporation and the slum clearance board are the best placed stakeholders in the city to create a change in the sanitation situation. Furthermore, 17 drivers and barriers for the implementation of non-sewered technologies are identified. The criteria catalogue was also theoretically tested for an example ward in Chennai. The findings of the study show that a catalogue of physical, technical, institutional and financial criteria is useful for planning a mix of technologies with the CWIS approach.
Funder
Direktion für Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Nature and Landscape Conservation,Urban Studies,Geography, Planning and Development,Architecture
Reference65 articles.
1. Balakrishnan K (2016) Heterogeneity within Indian cities. Available at: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sr333g9 (accessed 30 September 2021).
2. Indicators for the sustainability assessment of wastewater treatment systems
3. Barnes R, Ashbolt N (2006) Review of decision tools and trends for water and sanitation development projects (2006). Loughborough University. Available at: https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/Review_of_decision_tools_and_trends_for_water_and_sanitation_development_projects/9596627 (accessed 30 September 2021).
4. Bastian M, Heymann S, onconference, MJ-T international A, et al. (2009) Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. aaai.org. Available at: https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/09/paper/viewPaper/154 (accessed 1 October 2021).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献