Toward Validation of Constructs for Classifying Human Performance Dysfunction

Abstract

Impairment, physical disability, and social disability are constructs used to classify human performance dysfunction. This study presents these constructs as extensions to the theoretical conceptualization of human performance dysfunction and tests their validity in a sample of persons with musculoskeletal disorders. Data representing impairment and physical and social disability were obtained from a random telephone survey of 2,350 working-aged adults who reported a musculoskeletal disorder. Empirical factors derived from principal component analysis of the data were compared with conceptual definitions to establish construct validity. Results were tested on subsamples of males and females. Factors of mobility and posture, manual function, activities of daily living, and work in these data were accurate, minimal representations of the constructs of impairment, physical disability, and social disability. Findings are discussed with reference to further theory development and data collection.