Comparing Individuals with and without Mental Illness Using the Daily Activities Checklist

Author:

Brown Catana

Abstract

This study of the Daily Activities Checklist examined an aspect of construct validity, distinguishing differences between groups, specifically investigating differences in activity engagement in individuals with different types of mental illness (schizophrenia and mood disorders) and individuals without mental illness. The Daily Activities Checklist includes subscales of self-care, community living skills, socialization, and quality of performance. Individuals with schizophrenia (N=19), individuals with mood disorders (N=16), and individuals without mental illness (N=20) completed the Daily Activities Checklist every day for a one-week period. An ANCOVA with age as a covariate was used to examine differences in scores across the three groups. Individuals with mental illness scored lower than individuals without mental illness on the total score and all but one subscale of the Daily Activities Checklist. There was no difference between individuals with schizophrenia and individuals without mental illness on the quality subscale scores. Individuals with schizophrenia scored lower than individuals with mood disorders on the self-care subscale and the total score. These results support the usefulness of the Daily Activities Checklist in evaluating engagement in daily activities.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3