Postoperative Pain Management in Vitreoretinal Surgery for Retinal Detachment: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Massicotte Erika1,Hammamji Karim1,Landry Tara2,Häuser Winfried34,Fitzcharles Mary-Ann56

Affiliation:

1. Division of Ophthalmology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, University of Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada

2. McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital Medical Library, Montreal, Québec, Canada

3. Department Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany

4. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität München, München, Germany

5. Division of Rheumatology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada

6. Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the evidence for postoperative pain management in patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for retinal detachment by systematic review. Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed using multiple databases in July 2016 and September 2017. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts and analyzed selected papers in detail. Included studies assessed patients undergoing vitreoretinal surgery for retinal detachment and described postoperative pain management. Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria outlined in the “risk of bias” tool in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Results: Nine randomized controlled studies comprising 517 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain management included perioperative peribulbar, sub-Tenon, and retrobulbar anesthetic block; perioperative systemic anti-inflammatory and postoperative systemic and topical anti-inflammatory drugs; and ice compress. Pain scores were assessed with nominal, numerical, and visual analog scales. Risk of bias was low for 2 studies, unclear for 4 studies, and high for 3 studies. All studies reported better postoperative pain scores with the active treatment group except for a single study comparing retrobulbar chirocaine with and without clonidine. No serious adverse events were reported for any of the studies. Conclusion: Heterogeneity of studies did not allow for meta-analysis, but qualitative analysis suggests that pain relief can be achieved in the short term with a variety of treatment interventions. Additional study is required to specifically examine pain management strategies according to the characteristics of the anesthesia and surgery as well as the needs of the patient.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3