Outcomes of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair in Pseudophakic Eyes With Multifocal vs Monofocal Intraocular Lenses

Author:

Shahlaee Abtin12ORCID,Israilevich Rachel N.3,Mahmoudzadeh Raziyeh1ORCID,Salabati Mirataollah1,Wakabayashi Taku1,Yonekawa Yoshihiro1ORCID,Klufas Michael A.1

Affiliation:

1. Retina Service, Wills Eye Hospital, Mid Atlantic Retina, Philadelphia, PA, USA

2. Department of Ophthalmology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco, CA, USA

3. Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anatomic and visual acuity (VA) outcomes of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) repair in eyes with a multifocal intraocular lens (IOLs) and eyes with monofocal IOLs. Methods: This retrospective matched-cohort study comprised pseudophakic eyes that had pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) or PPV with scleral buckling for RRD. Eyes with multifocal IOLs (multifocal group) were matched with eyes with monofocal IOLs (control group) in a 1:2 ratio for age, sex, primary surgeon, timing of surgery from presentation, type of surgery, and macular status. Results: The multifocal group included 67 eyes and the control group, 134 eyes. The mean (±SD) follow-up was 785 ± 595 days and 746 ± 566 days, respectively ( P = .57). Overall, the single-surgery anatomic success rate was 76.1% in the multifocal group and 86.6% in the control group ( P = .06); 75.0% and 85.9%, respectively, for PPV ( P = .06); and 100% for PPV with scleral buckling in both groups ( P = 1.00). The mean final logMAR VA was 0.26 ± 0.34 (20/36 Snellen) in the multifocal group and 0.27 ± 0.36 (20/37 Snellen) in the control group ( P = .60). Conclusions: In pseudophakic eyes with an RRD, there was a trend toward better single-surgery anatomic success in eyes with a monofocal IOL than in eyes with a multifocal IOL treated with PPV, with similar anatomic outcomes for PPV with scleral buckling. Visual outcomes were similar between the groups and significantly improved compared with baseline.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3