Visual and Anatomic Outcomes in Perforating Ocular Injuries

Author:

Kanu Levi N.1ORCID,Jiang Yi1,Gonzalez Alvaro Fernandez-Vega1,Mieler William F.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, USA

Abstract

Purpose: This article reports the presentation, management, and outcomes in patients suffering perforating ocular injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted at a single ophthalmology Level 1 trauma center. Patients with evidence of traumatic ocular perforation, with surgical intervention attended by a single vitreoretinal surgeon (W.F.M.), were reviewed between 2009 and 2017. Results: Six eyes from 6 patients with perforating ocular injuries were studied. All patients were male, between ages 11 and 56 years. Perforation was the result of gunshots (3), other accidental injury (2), or surgical complication (1). Varying degrees of retinal detachments were seen in all 6 patients. Pars plana vitrectomy, with endolaser around posterior entry or exit wounds, was performed on average 21.7 ± 8.9 days from the time of injury (range, 0-58 days). In all cases with intraorbital foreign bodies, the foreign bodies were left in place. The most recent postoperative visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to counting fingers. Missile injuries tended to have poorer vision. All cases achieved full anatomic attachment at most recent follow-up. There have been no orbital complications related to retained intraorbital foreign bodies, including endophthalmitis, orbital infections, or mechanical strabismus. Conclusion: This study demonstrates successful anatomic outcomes of 6 cases of perforating ocular injuries. Visual outcomes were variable, though missile injuries demonstrated worse prognosis, whereas several nonmissile macula-involving cases achieved quite favorable results. Although traumatic perforating injuries generally have guarded visual prognoses, favorable results may be achieved in select scenarios.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3