Risk of Pneumothorax Requiring Pleural Drainage after Drainless VATS Pulmonary Wedge Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Laven Iris E.W.G.1,Daemen Jean H.T.1,Janssen Nicky1,Franssen Aimée J.P.M.1,Gronenschild Michiel H.M.2,Hulsewé Karel W.E.1,Vissers Yvonne L.J.1,de Loos Erik R.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands

2. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Objective Omitting pleural drainage after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for pulmonary wedge resections has been shown to be a safe approach to enhance recovery. However, major concerns remain regarding the risk of postoperative pneumothoraces requiring surgical interventions. Therefore, our objective was to provide conclusive evidence whether chest tube omission after VATS wedge resection is safe and does not increase the risk of pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage. Methods Five scientific databases were searched. Studies comparing patients with (CT group) and without chest tube drainage (NCT group) after VATS wedge resection were evaluated. Outcomes included radiographically diagnosed pneumothoraces and pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage, postoperative complications, hospitalization, and pain scores. Results Overall, 9 studies (3 randomized controlled trials) were included ( N = 928). Meta-analysis showed significantly more radiographically diagnosed pneumothoraces in the NCT group (risk ratio [RR] = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.56 to 4.29, P < 0.001; I 2 = 0%). However, no significant differences were found in postoperative pneumothoraces requiring pleural drainage (RR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.63 to 4.74, P = 0.29; I 2 = 0%) or complications (RR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.39 to 1.52, P = 0.46; I 2 = 0%). Furthermore, the NCT group showed significantly shorter hospitalization (mean difference = −1.26, 95% CI: −1.56 to −0.95, P < 0.001) with high heterogeneity ( I 2 = 58%, P = 0.02), and lower pain scores on postoperative day 1 (standard mean difference [SMD] = −0.98, 95% CI: −1.71 to −0.25, P = 0.009; I 2 = 92%) and postoperative day 2 (SMD = −1.28, 95% CI: −2.55 to −0.01, P = 0.05; I 2 = 96%) compared with the CT group. Conclusions VATS wedge resection without routine chest tube placement is suggested as a safe and less invasive approach in selected patients that does not increase the risk of a pneumothorax requiring pleural drainage.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3