Practice Patterns in Sternal Closure and Evaluation of Adoption of a Novel Sternal Closure Device

Abstract

Objective: The technique for sternal closure has remained largely unchanged owing to the efficacy, simplicity, and low cost of stainless-steel sternal wires. Despite their ubiquity, several other closure devices designed to address the complications associated with sternal wires such as sternal bleeding and dehiscence have become popular. We have developed a novel sternal closure device that reduces sternal bleeding and dehiscence. This study quantifies the use of currently available sternal closure devices and determines predicted uptake of the novel device. Methods: An electronic survey, designed to determine practice patterns for sternal closure, was distributed to 70 US cardiac surgeons. The survey included a discrete choice section in which surgeons evaluated relative value of device attributes including cost, ease of emergent sternal reentry, and dehiscence risk. Results: There were 70 surgeons from 30 states who completed the survey. The most frequent means of sternal closure was straight sternal wires (35.8%), followed by straight sternal wires plus figure-of-8 sternal wires (18.1%), double wires (10.9%), plates (10.2%), and other (25%). The relative utilization shifted from sternal wires to sternal plates as the risk for dehiscence increased. The adoption of the novel closure device was estimated at 34.6%. Conclusions: The standard stainless-steel sternal wire remains the most common means of sternal reapproximation, but its utilization is lower in patients at high risk for sternal dehiscence. Based on this survey, there is acceptance in the community for a novel sternal closure device designed to address the limitations of traditional sternal closure methods.