Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study from the UK National Data-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Minimally Invasive versus Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Study from the UK National Data

Published:2016-01 Issue:1 Volume:11 Page:15-23
ISSN:1556-9845
Container-title:Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
language:en
Short-container-title:Innovations

Author:

Attia Rizwan Q.¹,Hickey Graeme L.²³,Grant Stuart W.²⁴,Bridgewater Ben²³⁴,Roxburgh James C.¹,Kumar Pankaj⁵,Ridley Paul⁶,Bhabra Moninder⁷,Millner Russell W. J.⁸,Athanasiou Thanos⁹,Casula Roberto⁹,Chukwuemka Andrew⁹,Pillay Thasee¹⁰,Young Christopher P.¹

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK

2. Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

3. National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research, Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, UK

4. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, Wythenshawe, UK

5. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Morriston Hospital, Morriston, Swansea, UK

6. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK

7. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Heart and Lung Centre, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK

8. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lancashire Cardiac Centre, Victoria Hospital NHS Trust, Blackpool, UK

9. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

10. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/155698451601100104

Reference39 articles.

1. Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients

2. One-year outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Aortic Stenosis With a Next Generation Surgical Aortic Valve (TRITON) trial: A prospective multicenter study of rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement with the EDWARDS INTUITY Valve System

3. Two-Year Outcomes after Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement

4. Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement: First-Year Single-Center Experience

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement;Springer Surgery Atlas Series;2023

2. Minimally Invasive Access Aortic Arch Surgery;Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery;2017-09

3. Traditional Sternotomy versus Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients Stratified by Ejection Fraction;Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery;2017-01