Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies Using Active Learning and Monte Carlo Simulation

Author:

Fouladi Amirhossein1,Asadi Amin2,Sherer Eric A.3,Madadi Mahboubeh4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Senior Consultant, UNCOMN, Chatham, IL, USA

2. Data Science, AI, OR, and Logistics, University of Twente, Twente, Netherlands

3. Chemical Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA, USA

4. Marketing and Business Analytics, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, USA

Abstract

Introduction Detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the early stages through available screening tests increases the patient’s survival chances. Multimodal screening policies can benefit patients by providing more diverse screening options and balancing the risks and benefits of screening tests. We investigate the cost-effectiveness of a wide variety of multimodal CRC screening policies. Methods We developed a Monte Carlo simulation framework to model CRC dynamics. We proposed an innovative calibration process using machine learning models to estimate age- and size-specific adenomatous polyps’ progression and regression rates. The proposed approach significantly expedites the model parameter space search. Results Two multimodal proposed policies (i.e., 1] colonoscopy at 50 y and fecal occult blood test annually between 60 and 75 y and 2] colonoscopy at 50 and 60 y and fecal immunochemical test annually between 70 and 75 y) are identified as efficient frontier policies. Both policies are cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $50,000. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the sensitivity of results to a change in screening test costs as well as adherence behavior. The sensitivity analysis results suggest that the proposed policies are mostly robust to the considered changes in screening test costs, as there is a significant overlap between the efficient frontier policies of the baseline and the sensitivity analysis cases. However, the efficient frontier policies were more sensitive to changes in adherence behavior. Conclusion Generally, combining stool-based tests with visual tests will benefit patients with higher life expectancy and a lower expected cost compared with unimodal screening policies. Colonoscopy at younger ages (when the colonoscopy complication risk is lower) and stool-based tests at older ages are shown to be more effective. Highlights We propose a detailed Markov model to capture the colorectal cancer (CRC) dynamics. The proposed Markov model presents the detailed dynamics of adenomas progression to CRC. We use more than 44,000 colonoscopy reports and available data in the literature to calibrate the proposed Markov model using an innovative approach that leverages machine learning models to expedite the calibration process. We investigate the cost-effectiveness of a wide variety of multimodal CRC screening policies and compare their performances with the current in-practice policies.

Funder

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference66 articles.

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2024. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2024/2024-cancer-facts-and-figures-acs.pdf. [Accessed 8 February, 2024].

2. National Institutes of Health. CRC fact sheet. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/types/colorectal/screening-fact-sheet. [Accessed 3 March, 2018].

3. American Cancer Society. Cancer staging. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/colon-rectal-cancer/about/what-is-colorectal-cancer.html. [Accessed 24 February, 2018].

4. Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening

5. National Cancer Institute. Cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network. Available from: https://cisnet.cancer.gov/projections/colorectal/screening.php. [Accessed 5 January, 2023].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3