The Decision Making Control Instrument to Assess Voluntary Consent

Author:

Miller Victoria A.12345,Ittenbach Richard F.12345,Harris Diana12345,Reynolds William W.12345,Beauchamp Tom L.12345,Luce Mary Frances12345,Nelson Robert M.12345

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (VAM)

2. Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Childrenx’s Hospital Medical Center (RFI)

3. Center for the Integration of Genetic Healthcare Technologies, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (DH)

4. Richard Stockton College of New Jersey (WWR)

5. Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University (TLB)

Abstract

Background. The decision to participate in a research intervention or to undergo medical treatment should be both informed and voluntary. Objective. The aim of the present study was to develop an instrument to measure the perceived voluntariness of parents making decisions for their seriously ill children. Methods. A total of 219 parents completed questionnaires within 10 days of making such a decision at a large, urban tertiary care hospital for children. Parents were presented with an experimental form of the Decision Making Control Instrument (DMCI), a measure of the perception of voluntariness. Data obtained from the 28-item form were analyzed using a combination of both exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic techniques. Results. The 28 items were reduced to 9 items representing 3 oblique dimensions: Self-Control, Absence of Control, and Others’ Control. The hypothesis that the 3-factor covariance structure of our model was consistent with that of the data was supported. Internal consistency for the scale as a whole was high (0.83); internal consistency for the subscales ranged from 0.68 to 0.87. DMCI scores were associated with measures of affect, trust, and decision self-efficacy, supporting the construct validity of the new instrument. Conclusion. The DMCI is an important new tool that can be used to inform our understanding of the voluntariness of treatment and research decisions in medical settings.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference36 articles.

1. Lidz CW, Meisel A, Zerubavel E, Carter M, Sestak RM, Roth LH. Informed Consent: A Study of Decisionmaking in Psychiatry. New York: Guilford Press; 1984.

2. Getting Meaningful Informed Consent from Older Adults: A Structured Literature Review of Empirical Research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3