Caregiver-Reported Roles in Treatment Decision Making in Advanced Cancer and Associated Caregiving Burden and Psychological Distress: A Longitudinal Study

Author:

Ozdemir Semra123ORCID,Ng Sean12ORCID,Chaudhry Isha12,Teo Irene124,Malhotra Chetna12,Finkelstein Eric Andrew1325,

Affiliation:

1. Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

2. Signature Programme in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore

3. Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore

4. National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore

5. Duke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

Abstract

Objective To longitudinally examine caregiver-reported treatment decision-making roles and to investigate the associations of these roles with caregiver burden, caregiving esteem, caregiver anxiety, and depression. Methods 281 caregivers of patients with stage IV solid cancers were recruited from outpatient clinics in Singapore. Caregivers were eligible if they were aged ≥21 y, primary informal caregiver, and involved in treatment decision making. We used 3 y of longitudinal data. The decision-making roles were grouped into 4 categories: no family involvement, patient/physician-led, joint, and family-led/alone decision making. Mixed-effects linear regressions were used to assess associations between decision-making roles and caregiver outcomes. Results On average, 72% of caregivers reported family involvement in decision making. Compared with baseline, a higher proportion of caregivers at the 36-mo follow-up reported no family involvement (from 23% to 34%, P = 0.05) and patient/physician-led decision making (from 22% to 34%, P = 0.02), while a lower proportion reported family-led/alone (from 19% to 7%, P = 0.01) decision making. Compared with family-led/alone decision making, caregivers reporting no family involvement reported lower impact on finances (−0.15 [−0.28, −0.01], P = 0.03) while caregivers who reported patient/physician-led decision making reported lower impact on schedule and health (−0.12 [−0.20, −0.03], P = 0.01), and finances (−0.15 [−0.28, −0.03], P = 0.02), and lower anxiety (−0.69 [−1.17, −0.22], P < 0.01), and depressive symptoms (−0.69 [−1.12, −0.26], P < 0.01). Caregivers who reported joint decision making reported higher caregiving esteem (0.07 [0.01, 0.14], P = 0.02). Conclusions Higher family involvement in decision making was associated with higher caregiver burden and psychological distress. Help should be given so that family caregivers can support patient decision-making in a meaningful way. Highlights Compared with baseline, a lower proportion of caregivers at the 36-mo follow-up reported family-led or family-alone decision making, and a higher proportion of caregivers reported patient-led or physician-led decision making. Higher levels of family involvement in decision making were associated with burdens on caregivers’ daily life, health, and finances and increased caregiver anxiety and depression. Support must be given so that family members can contribute to making medical decisions in a rewarding manner.

Funder

Lien Centre for Palliative Care

Singapore Millennium Foundation

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3