Identifying Strategies to Improve Shared Decision Making for Pregnant Patients’ Decisions about Prenatal Genetic Screens and Diagnostic Tests

Author:

Collart Christina1ORCID,Craighead Caitlin1,Yao Meng2ORCID,Chien Edward K.1,Rose Susannah3,Frankel Richard M.4,Coleridge Marissa15,Hu Bo2,Edmonds Brownsyne Tucker6ORCID,Ranzini Angela C.7,Farrell Ruth M.158ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Obstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

2. Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

3. Experience Safety, Quality and Patient Experience, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

5. Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA

6. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis IN, USA

7. Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, OH, USA

8. Center for Bioethics, Clinical Transformation, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland OH, USA

Abstract

Purpose Prenatal genetic screens and diagnostic tests are vital components of prenatal care. The first prenatal visit is a critical time in the decision-making process when patients decide whether to use these tests in addition to address a series of other essential prenatal care aspects. We conducted this study to examine the role of a shared decision-making (SDM) instrument to support these discussions. Methods We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial of patients allocated to an SDM tool or usual care at their first prenatal visit. Participants completed a baseline survey to measure decision-making needs and preferences. Direct observation was conducted and analyzed using the OPTION scale to measure SDM during prenatal genetic testing discussions. Results Levels of SDM were similar across groups ( P = 0.081). The highest levels of SDM were observed during screening test discussions (NEST 2.4 ± 0.9 v. control 2.6 ± 1.0). Lowest levels were observed in discussions about patients’ preference for risk versus diagnostic information (NEST 1.0 ± 1.1 v. control 1.2 ± 1.3). Conclusion Study findings demonstrate the need for targeted patient-focused and provider-focused efforts to improve SDM to enhance patients’ informed decision making about these options. Importantly, patients’ baseline knowledge and attitudes need to be considered given that patients with less knowledge may need more carefully crafted communication. Highlights Choices about whether, when, and how to use prenatal genetic tests are highly preference-based decisions, with patients’ baseline attitudes about these options as a major driver in health care discussions. The decision-making process is also shaped by patient preferences regarding a shared or informed decision-making process for medical decisions that are highly personal and have significant ramifications for obstetric outcomes. There is a need to develop targeted efforts to improve decision making and enhance patients’ ability to make informed decisions about prenatal genetic tests in early pregnancy.

Funder

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3