A Quantitative Study of Decision Thresholds for Initiation of Antibiotics in Suspected Sepsis

Author:

Taylor Stephanie Parks123ORCID,Weissman Gary E.456ORCID,Kowalkowski Marc3ORCID,Admon Andrew J.789,Skewes Sable1,Xia Yunfei10,Chou Shih-Hsuing3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health, Charlotte NC, USA

2. Critical Illness Injury and Recovery Research Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Charlotte NC, USA

3. Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte NC, USA

4. Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

5. Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

6. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, And Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

7. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

8. Pulmonary Service, LTC Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

9. Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

10. Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA

Abstract

Background Clinicians’ decision thresholds for initiating antibiotics in patients with suspected sepsis have not been quantified. We aimed to define an average threshold of infection likelihood at which clinicians initiate antibiotics when treating a patient with suspected infection and to evaluate the influence of severity of illness and clinician-related factors on the threshold. Design This was a prospective survey of 153 clinicians responding to 8 clinical vignettes constructed from real-world data from 3 health care systems in the United States. We treated each hour in the vignette as a decision to treat or not treat with antibiotics and assigned an infection probability to each hour using a previously developed infection prediction model. We then estimated decision thresholds using regression models based on the timing of antibiotic initiation. We compared thresholds across categories of severity of illness and clinician-related factors. Results Overall, the treatment threshold occurred at a 69% probability of infection, but the threshold varied significantly across severity of illness categories—when patients had high severity of illness, the treatment threshold occurred at a 55% probability of infection; when patients had intermediate severity, the threshold for antibiotic initiation occurred at an infection probability of 69%, and the threshold was 84% when patients had low severity of illness ( P < 0.001 for group differences). Thresholds differed significantly across specialty, highest among infectious disease and lowest among emergency medicine clinicians and across years of experience, decreasing with increasing years of experience. Conclusions The threshold infection probability above which physicians choose to initiate antibiotics in suspected sepsis depends on illness severity as well as clinician factors. Implications Incorporating these context-dependent thresholds into discriminating and well-calibrated models will inform the development of future sepsis clinical decision support systems. Clinician-related differences in treatment thresholds suggests potential unwarranted variation and opportunities for performance improvement. Highlights Decision making about antibiotic initiation in suspected sepsis occurs under uncertainty, and little is known about clinicians’ thresholds for treatment. In this prospective study, 153 clinicians from 3 health care systems reviewed 8 real-world clinical vignettes representing patients with sepsis and indicated the time that they would initiate antibiotics. Using a model-based approach, we estimated decision thresholds and found that thresholds differed significantly across illness severity categories and by clinician specialty and years of experience.

Funder

American Thoracic Society

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Provider Perceptions of Antibiotic Initiation Strategies for Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia;Surgical Infections;2024-03-01

2. Reply to Adelman et al;Clinical Infectious Diseases;2023-04-24

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3