Knowledge, Attitudes, and Self-efficacy as Predictors of Preparedness for Oncology Clinical Trials

Author:

Manne Sharon12345,Kashy Deborah12345,Albrecht Terrance12345,Wong Yu-Ning12345,Flamm Anne Lederman12345,Benson Al B.12345,Miller Suzanne M.12345,Fleisher Linda12345,Buzaglo Joanne12345,Roach Nancy12345,Katz Michael12345,Ross Eric12345,Collins Michael12345,Poole David12345,Raivitch Stephanie12345,Miller Dawn M.12345,Kinzy Tyler G.12345,Liu Tasnuva12345,Meropol Neal J.12345

Affiliation:

1. Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA (SM)

2. Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA (DK)

3. Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA (TA)

4. Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA (Y-NW, SMM, LF, ER, DP, SR)

5. Department of Bioethics, Center for Ethics, Humanities & Spiritual Care, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA (ALF)

Abstract

Objective. This study used the Ottawa Decision Support Framework to evaluate a model examining associations between clinical trial knowledge, attitudinal barriers to participating in clinical trials, clinical trial self-efficacy, and clinical trial preparedness among 1256 cancer patients seen for their first outpatient consultation at a cancer center. As an exploratory aim, moderator effects for gender, race/ethnicity, education, and metastatic status on associations in the model were evaluated. Methods. Patients completed measures of cancer clinical trial knowledge, attitudinal barriers, self-efficacy, and preparedness. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was conducted to evaluate whether self-efficacy mediated the association between knowledge and barriers with preparedness. Results. The SEM explained 26% of the variance in cancer clinical trial preparedness. Self-efficacy mediated the associations between attitudinal barriers and preparedness, but self-efficacy did not mediate the knowledge-preparedness relationship. Conclusions. Findings partially support the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and suggest that assessing patients’ level of self-efficacy may be just as important as evaluating their knowledge and attitudes about cancer clinical trials.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3