Differential Effects of Video Analysis for Special Educators Related to Intervention Characteristics, Dependent Variables, and Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Differential Effects of Video Analysis for Special Educators Related to Intervention Characteristics, Dependent Variables, and Student Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis of Single-Case Research

Published:2019-11-28 Issue:4 Volume:36 Page:202-214
ISSN:0162-6434
Container-title:Journal of Special Education Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Spec Educ Technol

Author:

Morin Kristi L.¹^ORCID,Nagro Sarah²,Artis Jonet³,Haas April⁴,Ganz Jennifer B.⁴,Vannest Kimberly J.⁵

Affiliation:

1. College of Education, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA

2. Division of Special Education and disAbility Research, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, USA

3. Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA

4. Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

5. College of Education and Social Services, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA

Abstract

Video analysis is effective for changing the instructional practices of a variety of special educators in different settings and contexts; however, questions remain regarding whether (a) intervention characteristics moderate the results, (b) effects are differentiated by type of dependent variable, and (c) student outcomes improve when video analysis is used to improve educators’ skills. This meta-analysis reports the overall impact that video analysis has on student outcomes as well as the differential impact on special educator outcomes by dependent variable and implementation variables (i.e., length of videos, number of intervention videos, primary evaluator, and timing of feedback). A total of 30 publications reported outcomes for special education preservice teachers, in-service teachers, and paraprofessionals; of these, 12 publications reported student outcomes. Results are positive and indicate that video analysis is effective for improving student outcomes and that it can be successfully implemented in a variety of ways.

Funder

Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Science Applications,Education

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0162643419890250

Reference69 articles.

1. *Ahuja R. S. (2000). The relative effectiveness of two different peer coaching programs and a structured self-evaluation program with elementary teachers using direct instruction (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest (UMI No. 9978924).

2. When you can't Get There: Using Video Self-Monitoring as a Tool for Changing the Behaviors of Pre-Service Teachers

3. *American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2019). Participation map. Retrieved from http://edtpa.aacte.org/state-policy

4. Impact of Video Self-Monitoring With Graduated Training on Implementation of Embedded Instructional Learning Trials

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Examining the Use of Video Analysis on Teacher Instruction and Teacher Outcomes;The Journal of Special Education;2022-11-24

2. Using Simulated Video Analysis to Promote Special Education Teacher Candidates’ Professional Knowledge and Reflective Ability;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2022-01-22

3. Promoting Reflective Ability Through a Comprehensive Field Experience That Combined Video Analysis and Bug-In-Ear Coaching;Journal of Special Education Technology;2021-06-16