‘Thin labourism’: Ideological and policy comparisons between the Australian, British, and New Zealand labour parties

Author:

Manwaring Rob1ORCID,Duncan Grant2,Lees Charlie1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Business, Government and Law, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

2. School of People, Environment and Planning, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand

Abstract

Centre–left political parties are undergoing an identity crisis. This article is a comparative analysis of how the three sister labour parties in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand are refurbishing their agendas. We integrate Barrientos and Powell’s framework, with Freeden’s concept of ideological morphology, to systematically map the three parties across three main domains: their discourse and values, their political economy, and their social policy agendas. We then apply four different analytical frames to better understand the ideological and policy trajectories of our cases. These frames comprise ‘values, not ideology’, ‘quietism’, ‘third way’, and ‘thin labourism’. We argue that the frame of ‘thin labourism’ best captures the recent developments of these modern labour parties. In sum, the parties are still rooted in a recognisable centre–left tradition, but they operating from a narrower base of core values.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference90 articles.

1. Albanese A (2019a) From rear vision to looking ahead: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra, ACT, Australia, 8 November 2019. Australian Labor Party.

2. Albanese A (2019b) Honour, Responsibility and a New Vision, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 27 May 2019. Australian Labor Party.

3. Albanese A (2019c) Jobs and the Future of Work: Address to the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (Vision Statement 1). Perth, WA. Australian Labor Party.

4. Albanese A (2019d) Labor and Democracy: Address to the Chifley Research Centre Conference (Vision Statement 3), Sydney, NSW, Australia, 7 December 2019. Australian Labor Party.

5. Albanese A (2019e) Labor and the Economy: Address to think tank Per Capita (Vision Statement 2), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 22 November 2019. Australian Labor Party.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3