A Study to Examine the Effect of Needle Gauge on Pain Perception in Patients Receiving Treatment With Botulinum Toxin in 2 Different Anatomical Areas

Author:

Hollingsworth Karen E.1,Brown Tim2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Nurse Practitioner Candidate, Berwick, Victoria, Australia

2. Private Practice, Berwick, VIC, Australia

Abstract

Botulinum toxin injection for treatment of rhytids is the commonest cosmetic intervention undertaken worldwide. It requires re-treatment at 3-month intervals for the effect to remain. Consequently, patient comfort is paramount in order for the procedure to remain acceptable. Intuitively, patients expect that smaller needles will be less painful, and this study examines the pain caused by needles of 2 gauges (31 and 32) when administering botulinum toxin in 2 anatomical areas. Patients were randomized into having the left or right side of their face treated with either a 31- or 32-gauge needle during botulinum toxin administration. Participants were asked to determine whether the left- or right-side treatment was most painful. The study was repeated in the glabellar and paraorbital regions. A total of 103 participants entered the study; 98 had the glabellar region treated and 76 the crow’s feet, and 72 patients had both regions treated. For the glabellar region, the smaller 32-gauge needle was significantly more painful than the larger 31-gauge needle ( P < .01). There was no difference in patient’s pain perception between gauges of needle when treating the crow’s feet area ( P = .9). The 31-gauge needles produce significantly less pain than smaller 32-gauge needles when treating the glabellar region with botulinum toxin, but not in the periorbital region. We propose that this is due to differences in fascial adherence between the 2 areas. Consequently, we would recommend administering botulinum toxin with a 31-gauge needle in all areas.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3