Transumbilical Retroglandular Breast Augmentation, a Review of 158 Cases and a Comparison with Traditional Approaches

Author:

Wittenberg Joerg M.1,Leventhal Marc2

Affiliation:

1. Hollister, California

2. Rancho Cucamonga, California

Abstract

Introduction: The transumbilical (TU) approach for breast augmentation is performed with endoscopical assistance and leaves no visible scar on the breast. The recovery time should be shortened and the complication rate should be decreased compared with those of the standard periareolar (PA) or of the inframammary (IM) approach. This study was undertaken to compare the results of these three surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study of 214 patients evaluated 158 patients with the TU approach, 27 patients with the PA approach, and 29 patients with the IM approach. Group I patients are those who had surgery in the first 9 months and Group II patients are those who had surgery in the second 9 months. Statistical data were tabulated for surgery and anesthesia time, blood loss, implant size, patient age, and follow-up time. Complications were reported and compared for the different surgeries. Results: There was no significant difference in the age of the patients in these three groups. Surgery time was longest for the PA approach and was not significantly different between the TU and IM approaches. The implant sizes were comparable between the three groups. Less hematoma formation, fewer infections, less sensory dysfunction and postoperative pain and swelling were seen in the TU patients. Also, the complications in the Group II-TU patients was less when compared with patients in Group I-TU. Some problems, like healing of the umbilical incision, disconnection of the filling tube, and irritation of the abdominal tissues, are specific to the TU approach. Discussion: The results of this study showed a similar or smaller number of problems with the TU approach if the patient selection is correct. With increasing operator experience, a significant decrease in complications was seen. The TU approach is a good alternative and a valid procedure for the right patient.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Transumbilical Silicone Breast Augmentation;Annals of Plastic Surgery;2023-03-08

2. Our Experience With Transumbilical Breast Augmentation: Largest Published Series to Date With 2263 Patients;The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery;2019-10-08

3. Transumbilical Breast Augmentation;Aesthetic Surgery of the Breast;2014-09-11

4. Transumbilical Breast Augmentation;Clinics in Plastic Surgery;2009-01

5. 2003 Guidelines for Breast Augmentation Surgery;The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery;2003-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3