Faculty Self- and Needs Assessment of Preparedness for Integrating Active Learning Based on Medina's Conceptual Framework

Author:

Joseph Merlyn1ORCID,Farris Charlotte1,Martinez Mardoqueo2,Demps Elaine1,Hernández-Muñoz José J.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Texas A&M University, Texas, USA.

2. Presbyterian Gastroenterology, New Mexico, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Active learning (AL) is recognized as a valuable learning strategy. OBJECTIVE Using a conceptual framework, the objective of this study was to conduct a faculty self- and needs assessment to determine the extent to which the faculty at one college of pharmacy perceived they already carried out AL, describe faculty challenges, and evaluate faculty examples of AL techniques. METHODS A 19-question survey was administered in July 2017 to all 50 college faculty. Survey question types included multiple-choice single- or multiple-answer questions and open-ended questions. For validity, Medina's conceptual framework of 4 key elements for the effective administration of AL was used. For reliability, the draft survey questions were reviewed multiple times and revised accordingly. RESULTS Thirty-five faculty members, 70%, completed the survey in full. The majority of the faculty perceived that they carried out 3 of the 4 key elements during lectures: activate prior knowledge (74%), involve the majority of students (89%), and provide feedback (91%). However, only 37% stated they promoted metacognition, another key element. Our qualitative analysis identified (1) faculty had misconceptions about most of Medina's conceptual framework elements, (2) challenges to AL implementation included: need for more technology training, perception that AL requires cutting course material, beliefs that AL does not work, and fear of poor evaluations with AL implementation, and (3) suggestions to improve AL included: faculty development, training students on the importance of AL, and integrating AL throughout the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS Although most faculties indicated they integrated AL in their teaching, faculty misconceptions, and beliefs suggest the need for long-term faculty and organizational development using strategies aligned with or seeking to change the beliefs of the faculty and college system.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference22 articles.

1. Bonwell CC, Eison JA. Active learning: creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development; 1991.

2. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics

3. Identifying Key Features of Effective Active Learning: The Effects of Writing and Peer Discussion

4. The Impact of Problem-based Learning on Students' Perceptions of Preparedness for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3