Mentorship in Undergraduate Biomedical Education: Identifying Student Opinions and Expectations

Author:

Wright Bradley C.1,Schadler Aric D.2,Swanson Hollie I.1

Affiliation:

1. Pharmacology and Nutritional Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

2. Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Abstract

Objective To evaluate undergraduate biomedical education student opinions and expectations on mentorship. Methods A survey was administered to students enrolled in the undergraduate biology, neuroscience and nursing programs at a large public research-intensive university. The survey queried demographics, previous mentorship experiences, ideal qualities of mentors, benefits/value of mentorship and future plans for seeking mentorship. Survey responses were evaluated using either t-test comparisons or one-way ANOVA. Results The majority of the respondents were female and were interested in pursuing professional schools (nursing and medicine). Survey results indicate high student interest in receiving mentoring, but few were active participants in a mentoring relationship. Respondents indicated either lack of knowledge or discomfort in identifying a mentor. While faculty mentors versus peer mentors were preferred, respondents indicated that mentoring by either faculty or peers would be of value. Survey results indicate that desired benefits of mentoring included guidance in future education and career decisions, networking and career advice. Conclusion The major conclusions are that despite high student interest in being mentored, their participation in mentoring is very low. These finding are supportive of the development of structured mentoring programs to facilitate and enhance mentoring of undergraduate STEM students and aid in their academic career progression.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals

2. Mentoring and Undergraduate Academic Success: A Literature Review

3. Statistics UDoL. STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes and yes. Monthly Labor Review Web site. https://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis-or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm. Published 2015. Accessed November 12, 2020.

4. Strada-Gallup. Mentoring college students to success. https://tacc.org/sites/default/files/documents/2018-11/strada-gallupalumnisurvey_year4report.pdf. Published 2018. Accessed November 11, 2020.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3