Point-of-Encounter Assessment: Using Health Belief Model Constructs to Change Grading Behaviors

Author:

McLean Susan F1ORCID,Francis Maureen2,Lacy Naomi L2ORCID,Alvarado Andres3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

2. Department of Medical Education, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

3. Office of Diversity, Inclusion, and Global Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA

Abstract

Objective: Fourth-year medical students need feedback to improve. Even during 1-month rotations, there needs to be a formal mid-clerkship feedback session. Better feedback involves multiple surgical evaluators at multiple levels. Constructs from the Health Belief Model of behavior change were used to assess faculty and resident grading behaviors to create a more usable evaluation system. A point-of-encounter (POE) system was created. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy of a POE clinical evaluation card (CEC) system which was initiated to increase evaluator’s participation in grading and formative feedback prior to mid-clerkship evaluation. Design: The study was a 1-year retrospective cohort study reviewing the CECs for level of evaluator, content, and student compliance. A Likert-type scale survey regarding the usage of the clinical cards was also completed by evaluators. Setting: Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center at El Paso, during 2 fourth-year medical student rotations, Subinternship (Sub-I), and Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU). Participants: 34 fourth-year medical students and 20 evaluators. Results: Students turned in a mean of 10 cards, 75% in SICU and 65% in Sub-I turned in all 10 cards. There were significantly greater advanced residents evaluating during Sub-I vs SICU: mean evals by PGY3 were 1.9 vs 0.75 ( p = .01) and mean evals by PGY5 were 1.4 vs 0.1 ( p < .0001). There were significantly more faculty completing evaluations during SICU vs Sub-I: 2.5 faculty evals/student vs 1.4 faculty evals/student ( p = .023). Evaluator ratings were high on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with most responses near the “strongly agree” rating of 4.7 to 4.8. Conclusions: Use of POE CECs met goals of having at least 7 CECs turned in by mid-clerkship and 10 at end-clerkships. Formative evaluations by mid-clerkship went from 0 to 7 evaluations. Evaluator surveys highlighted clarity and efficiency as reasons for using CECs.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3