Exploring Anki Usage Among First-Year Medical Students During an Anatomy & Physiology Course: A Pilot Study

Author:

Levy Joshua1ORCID,Ely Kencie1,Lagasca Gemma1,Kausar Hiba1,Patel Deepal1,Andersen Shaun1,Georges Carlos2,Simanton Edward1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Educational Outcomes and Assessment, Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

2. Department of Computer Science, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Abstract

Objectives As medical schools worldwide condense the preclinical phase of medical education, it is increasingly important to identify resources that help medical students retain and employ the medical information. One popular tool among medical students is an application called Anki, a free and open-source flashcard program utilizing spaced repetition for quick and durable memorization. The purpose of this study is to determine how variable Anki usage among first-year medical students throughout a standardized anatomy and physiology course correlates with performance. Methods We designed a novel Anki add-on called “Anki Stat Scraper” to collect data on first-year medical students at Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine during their 8-week anatomy and physiology course. Anki users (N = 45) were separated into four groups: Heavy (N = 5), intermediate (N = 5), light (N = 16), and limited-Anki (N = 19) users, based on the time each student spent on the flashcard app, how many flashcards they studied per day, and how many days they used the app prior to their anatomy and physiology exam. A 14-question Likert scale questionnaire was administered to each participant to gauge their understanding of Anki and how they used the app to study. Results Heavy and intermediate Anki users had higher average exam scores than their counterparts who did not use Anki as a study method. Average exam scores were 90.34%, 91.74%, 85.86%, and 87.75% for heavy, intermediate, light, and limited-Anki users respectively (p > 0.05). Our survey demonstrated that Anki users spent an average of 73.86% of their study time using Anki, compared to an average of 36.53% for limited-Anki users (p < 0.001). Conclusion Anki users did not score significantly higher compared to limited-Anki users. However, survey responses from students believe that Anki may still be a useful educational tool for future medical students.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Corish B. Medical knowledge doubles every few months; how can clinicians keep up? Elsevier Connect. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/medical-knowledge-doubles-every-few-months-how-can-clinicians-keep-up.

2. Structure of pre-clerkship curriculum. AAMC. https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/curriculum-reports/interactive-data/structure-pre-clerkship-curriculum.

3. The Impact of Educational Resources and Perceived Preparedness on Medical Education Performance

4. Medical student use of digital learning resources

5. The Internet School of Medicine: Use of Electronic Resources by Medical Trainees and the Reliability of those Resources

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3