Illusions of Ticket-Splitting

Author:

Feigert Frank B.1

Affiliation:

1. North Texas State University

Abstract

Studies of ticket-splitting have been based on flaws of evidence and conception, whether using aggregate or survey data. A common basis for error has been the "two-office split- result" approach. Errors devolving from this approach, for example, assume that split congressional districts or split gubernatorial/ state legislative alignments are indeed based on ticket-splitting. Survey studies, with rare exception, suffer from the problem of voter recall, reliability of reported information, and the "missing GOP vote" explanation. Both aggregate and survey studies commonly either ignore the incomplete problem or understate it significantly. However, the high number of incomplete ballots suggests, along with other data, that ticket-splitting is not necessarily widespread or increasing. Approaches to remedy these problems are suggested.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3