Research Consent Models Used in Prospective Studies of Neurologically Deceased Organ Donors: A Systematic Review

Author:

D’Aragon Frederick1ORCID,Burns Karen E. A.234,Yaworski Amanda5,Lucas Amanda6,Arseneau Erika4,Belley-Cote Emilie4,Dhanani Sonny7,Frenette Anne-Julie8,Lamontagne François1,Lauzier François910,Akhtar Aemal4,Oczkowski Simon4,Rochwerg Bram4,Meade Maureen O.4

Affiliation:

1. Université de Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

2. University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

3. Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

4. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

6. Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

7. University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

8. University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada

9. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Canada

10. Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada

Abstract

Research to inform the care of neurologically deceased organ donors is complicated by a lack of standards for research consent. In this systematic review, we aim to describe current practices of soliciting consent for participation in prospective studies of neurologically deceased donors, including the frequency and justification for these various models of consent. Among the 74 studies included, 14 did not report on any regulatory review, and 13 did not report on the study consent procedures. Of the remaining 47 studies, 24 utilized a waiver of research consent. The most common justification for a waiver of research consent related to the fact that neurologically deceased donors are not considered human subjects. In conclusion, among studies of neurologically deceased donors, research consent models vary and are inconsistently reported. Consensus and standardization in the application of research consent models will help to advance this emerging field of research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Education,Social Psychology

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3