Consent Requirements for Testing Health Policies: An Intercontinental Comparison of Expert Opinions

Author:

Berner-Rodoreda Astrid1ORCID,McMahon Shannon12,Eyal Nir34,Hossain Puspita56,Rabbani Atonu67,Barua Mrittika68,Sarker Malabika16,Metta Emmy9,Mmbaga Elia9,Leshabari Melkizedeck9,Wikler Daniel10,Bärnighausen Till110

Affiliation:

1. Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Germany

2. Social and Behavioral Interventions, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA

3. Department of Health, Behavior, Society and Policy, Rutgers University, Piscataway, USA

4. Center for Population-Level Bioethics, New Brunswick, USA

5. McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada

6. BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

7. Department of Economics, University of Dhaka, Dhaka, Bangladesh

8. Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen, Netherlands

9. School of Public Health and Social Sciences, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania

10. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Department of Global Health and Population, Boston, USA

Abstract

Individual informed consent is a central requirement for clinical research on human subjects, yet whether and how consent requirements should apply to health policy experiments (HPEs) remains unclear. HPEs test and evaluate public health policies prior to implementation. We interviewed 58 health experts in Tanzania, Bangladesh and Germany on informed consent requirements for HPEs. Health experts across all countries favored a strong evidence base, prior information to the affected populations, and individual consent for ‘risky’ HPEs. Differences pertained to individual risk perception, how and when consent by group representatives should be obtained and whether HPEs could be treated as health policies. The study adds to representative consent options for HPEs, yet shows that more research is needed in this field – particularly in the present Covid-19 pandemic which has highlighted the need for HPEs nationally and globally.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Education,Social Psychology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. One lesson of COVID-19: Conduct more health policy trials;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences;2022-06-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3