Dynamic Consent: An Evaluation and Reporting Framework

Author:

Prictor Megan1ORCID,Lewis Megan A.2,Newson Ainsley J.3,Haas Matilda45,Baba Sachiko6,Kim Hannah7,Kokado Minori6,Minari Jusaku8,Molnár-Gábor Fruzsina9,Yamamoto Beverley6,Kaye Jane110,Teare Harriet J. A.110

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia

2. RTI International, Seattle, Washington, USA

3. Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

5. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

6. Osaka University, Suita, Japan

7. Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

8. Uehiro Research Division for iPS Cell Ethics, CiRA, Kyoto University, Japan

9. Heidelberg Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Germany

10. University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

Dynamic consent (DC) is an approach to consent that enables people, through an interactive digital interface, to make granular decisions about their ongoing participation. This approach has been explored within biomedical research, in fields such as biobanking and genomics, where ongoing contact is required with participants. It is posited that DC can enhance decisional autonomy and improve researcher–participant communication. Currently, there is a lack of evidence about the measurable effects of DC-based tools. This article outlines a framework for DC evaluation and reporting. The article draws upon the evidence for enhanced modes of informed consent for research as the basis for a logic model. It outlines how future evaluations of DC should be designed to maximize their quality, replicability, and relevance based on this framework. Finally, the article considers best-practice for reporting studies that assess DC, to enable future research and implementation to build upon the emerging evidence base.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Communication,Education,Social Psychology

Cited by 50 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A rapid review of the benefits and challenges of dynamic consent;Research Ethics;2024-09-09

2. Dynamic governance: A new era for consent for stem cell research;Stem Cell Reports;2024-09

3. Distributed management of patient data-sharing informed consents for clinical research;Computers in Biology and Medicine;2024-09

4. Privacy preserving technology in ophthalmology;Current Opinion in Ophthalmology;2024-08-27

5. The Answer ALS return of results study: Answering the duty to disclose;Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration;2024-08-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3