Effect of Bumetanide on Facial Nerve Regeneration in Rat Model

Author:

Longur Ecem Sevim1,Yiğit Özgür2,Kalaycık Ertugay Çiğdem2,Araz Server Ela2,Adatepe Turgut3,Akakın Dilek4,Orun Oya5,Karagöz Köroğlu Ayça4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Ercis State Hospital, Van, Turkey

2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

3. Department of Neurology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

4. Department of Histology and Embryology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

5. Department of Biophysics, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

Abstract

Objective We investigated the effects of bumetanide alone and in combination with dexamethasone on facial nerve regeneration in rats with facial paralysis. Study Design A prospective controlled animal study. Setting An animal laboratory. Subjects and Methods Facial paralysis was induced in 32 Wistar rats that we then divided into 4 groups: group 1, control; group 2, bumetanide; group 3, dexamethasone; group 4, bumetanide and dexamethasone. Electroneurography was performed 1, 2, and 4 weeks later, and nerve regeneration was evaluated by electron and light microscopy and Western blotting in week 4. Results Regarding the comparison between preoperative values and week 4, the latency difference in group 1 (1.25 milliseconds) was significantly higher than those of groups 2 to 4 (0.56, 0.34, and 0.10 milliseconds, respectively; P = .001). The latency increment in groups 2 and 3 was higher than that of group 4 ( P = .002 and P = .046) in week 4, whereas groups 2 and 3 did not differ significantly ( P = .291). Amplitude difference was not statistically significant from week 4 among all groups (all P > .05). The number of myelinated axons was significantly higher in all treatment groups than in the control group ( P = .001). Axon number and intensity were significantly higher in group 4 as compared with groups 2 and 3 ( P = .009, P = .005). Conclusion After primary neurorrhaphy, dexamethasone and bumetanide alone promoted nerve recovery based on electrophysiologic and histologic measures. Combination therapy was, however, superior.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3