Effect of Palatal Implants on Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Compliance

Author:

Gillespie M. Boyd1,Wylie Paul E.2,Lee-Chiong Teofilo3,Rapoport David M.4

Affiliation:

1. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA

2. Arkansas Center for Sleep Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

3. Sleep Center at National Jewish Medical Center, Denver, Colorado, USA

4. Sleep Disorders Center, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

Abstract

Objective. Determine if the Pillar palatal implant system reduces continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) pressure and improves patient compliance with CPAP therapy. Study Design. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Setting. Four geographically dispersed tertiary sleep disorder referral centers. Methods. Subjects with mild to moderate sleep apnea dissatisfied with CPAP because of pressure-related complaints were randomized to receive Pillar implants or a sham procedure performed in double-blind fashion. Active and sham groups were compared for changes in therapeutic CPAP pressures (primary outcome) with a 90-day follow-up sleep study and CPAP compliance (secondary outcome) with a 90-day smart card report. Results. Twenty-six subjects were randomized to Pillar implants and 25 to a sham implant procedure. There were no differences between groups with regard to demographics and baseline parameters. Both sham and active groups had reduced mean CPAP pressure (−1.1 vs −0.5 cm H2O) with no difference between groups ( P = .32) at 90-day follow-up. In addition, there was no difference in average daily CPAP use between groups ( P = .80). Both groups experienced improvements in Epworth sleepiness scores and Functional Outcome of Sleep Questionnaire scores at 90 days with no differences between groups. The active group reported significantly higher CPAP satisfaction scores than the sham group ( P = .04). Conclusion. Pillar implants do not significantly reduce CPAP pressure or increase CPAP compliance compared to sham controls but may subjectively improve CPAP satisfaction. These findings do not presently support the use of Pillar implants as an adjunctive treatment to improve CPAP compliance.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3