Adverse Events and Time to Diagnosis of In-Office Laryngeal Biopsy Procedures

Author:

Cohen Jacob T.12,Bishara Taiser1,Trushin Vladimir1,Benyamini Limor1

Affiliation:

1. Head and Neck Center, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel

2. Laboratory for Applied Cancer Research, Rambam Healthcare Campus, Rappaport Institute of Medicine and Research, Technion–Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

Abstract

Objective To examine the adverse events and time to diagnosis of in-office laryngeal biopsy (IOB) procedures. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Outpatient clinic–tertiary referral medical center. Subjects and Methods A total of 390 IOBs were included in this study. Data on demographic characteristics, outcomes, and complications were collected. Complications were classified as severe—necessitating further intervention or admission—or mild and self-limited. Delay in diagnosis, assessed as a complication of IOB, was calculated as the time from initial examination to final diagnosis. Results Of 390 IOBs, 4 (1%) had complications: epistaxis (n = 2), vocal fold hematoma (n = 1), and aspiration event (n = 1). There were no reports of complications at follow-up. The sensitivity of IOB versus direct laryngoscopy biopsies was 77.8%, and the specificity was 95.1%. When the IOB showed malignancy as a final diagnosis, time to diagnosis was 10.7 days (95% CI, 8.6-12.8). When IOB pathology results changed from benign or carcinoma in situ to malignant (squamous cell carcinoma) by direct laryngoscopy, time to diagnosis was longer: 49.1 days (95% CI, 38.1-60.1) and 36.1 days (95% CI, 15.1-57.1; P < .05), respectively. Conclusions In this cohort, IOBs appear to be free of significant adverse events. IOBs for suspicious laryngeal lesions shorten the time to diagnosis and treatment for the majority of patients; the minority showed a small and insignificant delay.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3