Comparison of Hybrid Laryngotracheal Reconstruction to Traditional Single- and Double-Stage Laryngotracheal Reconstruction

Abstract

Objectives (1) To describe outcomes from and modifications to the hybrid laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) technique and (2) to compare this technique to traditional single- and double-stage LTR (ssLTR/dsLTR). Study Design Chart review with case series. Setting Tertiary care otolaryngology specialty hospital. Subjects All patients under 18 years of age who underwent LTR by a single surgeon from July 1, 2009, to December 31, 2013. Methods Charts were assessed for age, gender, etiology of stenosis, type of reconstruction, comorbidities, length of stay, complications, and tracheostomy status. Analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank sum analysis. Results Forty-four patients were identified, with 13 hybrid LTRs, 27 ssLTRs, and 4 dsLTRs. Of the hybrid LTRs, an overall decannulation rate of 76.9% was noted, comparable to those for dsLTR. The hybrid LTR technique offered a significantly shorter period of narcotic use when compared to ssLTR (median 15 vs 21 days, P < .01). No patients in the hybrid LTR group developed supraglottic granulation tissue. There was no statistically significant difference in median length of stay for ssLTRs, dsLTRs, and hybrid LTRs ( P = .38). Conclusion The hybrid LTR technique is well tolerated and useful in patients of all ages. Narcotics can be weaned more quickly due to the presence of a secure airway at all times via the existing tracheostomy. Use of a long stent prevents formation of granulation tissue that may be seen with a suprastomal stent. This technique should be considered in patients with high-grade stenosis with a preexisting tracheostomy.